,
Politics News
Kansas legislative candidate Brandon Whipple
A Tea Party group in Kansas is saying that a Democratic
candidate for the state House of Representatives should not be elected
because he does not have children.
Literature dropped off at homes in Wichita Saturday by Kansans for
Liberty, a Tea Party group, says that Democrat Brandon Whipple should
not be elected to the state House because he has no children. It is one
of a list of reasons why Whipple, 30, should not be elected over
Republican Rick Lindsey in the newly drawn district, according to the
literature.
"Can someone with no children really understand your family's needs?" it reads, with "no children" written in red.
Literature can be found here.
Whipple denounced the literature as "extreme" and said his wife,
Chelsea, takes an active role in the race. Kansans for Liberty does not
fully understand his situation, he said. "It is a personal attack,"
Whipple told The Huffington Post. "It offends me because my wife and I
are trying to have kids."
Craig Gabel, the head of Kansans for Liberty, stands by the
literature, saying that the perspective of a person changes when they
have children and that is why the line was included. "If you have no
experience in an area, it is hard for you to make informed decision in
an area," Gabel said.
Gabel said this includes parents wanting neighborhood schools and the
ability to spank their children without fear of state officials.
"Someone who does not have kids and does not sweat blood thinking they
can't spank them -- if you don't have kids you don't understand that."
Whipple's
opponent, Lindsey, also does not have children, but the Tea Party has
not campaigned against him because Lindsey is more in line with the
party's principles, said Gabel.
The piece also criticizes Whipple's experience as a public school
teacher, calling him a career government employee, and attacks him for
not having his name on the deed to his house. It calls the candidate's
beliefs into question, saying Whipple told a neighborhood group that
while he is a Democrat, he married into a Republican family and "learned
to compromise."
Whipple countered that while he has taught in the public schools, he
has been teaching in private colleges since his unsuccessful 2010 state
House race and that he placed his name on the house deed earlier this
year. "It is filled with lies," Whipple said of the literature. "It is
flat out lies."
The no-children argument has been used several other times in
political races. In Kansas in 2008, state Rep. Sean Gatewood (D-Topeka)
was noted in literature for not having children at the time. In
Westfield, N.J., in 2009, Democratic town Councilman Tom Bigosinski used
the no-children issue against his Republican opponent Keith Loughlin
during the
pair's only debate. Bigosinski, who
lost the race to Loughlin, later explained he wasn't trying to be derogatory, only pointing out an "important distinction."
"There are profound differences between the two of us," Bigosinski, then 41,
said in the debate
against Loughlin, who was 31 at the time. "Unlike Keith, I'm a husband,
I'm a father, I'm a homeowner and I'm a taxpayer and I have been for
many years."
The Whipple attack
comes the same week
that Kansas Republicans sent out a mailer in a Wichita state Senate
district questioning why Democrat Keith Humphrey changed his last name
from DeSoto when he was 11. Humphrey, a candidate for state Senate,
changed his name after he was adopted by his stepfather. Whipple's
district overlaps Humphrey's.
Whipple said he believes Gabel and his group have moved the debate to
a new level. "If you want to attack me for my personal stances on
property taxes that's one thing," he said. "But an attack on not having
kids takes it to a different leve